Index  ›  world  ›  Forbes
world · Forbes ↗

1.7 Million Satellites Will Have ‘Devastating Consequences,’ Study Says

Forbes Published Jul 2, 2026 Reviewed Jul 3, 2026 ✓ Reviewed by citations.press editors
Citation-ready fact
A new study by the European Southern Observatory warns that plans to launch more than 1.7 million satellites into orbit could have “devastating consequences for astronomy.”
more than 1.7 million · satellites
European Southern Observatory, study
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
The study concludes that Earth orbit should be limited to 100,000 faint satellites to protect modern ground-based astronomy.
100000 satellites · maximum number of faint satellites in Earth orbit
The study, European Southern Observatory study
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
According to Orbital Radar, there are currently 17,501 satellites orbiting Earth, with 10,000 of them being active SpaceX Starlink satellites.
17501 satellites · satellites orbiting Earth10000 satellites · active SpaceX Starlink satellites
Orbital Radar
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
SpaceX has plans to launch 20,000 Starlink satellites.
20000 satellites · Starlink satellites
SpaceX
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
SpaceX currently has 10.3 million subscribers across 164 countries.
10.3 million · subscribers164 countries · countries with subscribers
SpaceX
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
SpaceX has filed plans to send one million additional satellites into orbit for space-based data centers.
1 million · additional satellites for space-based data centers
SpaceX
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
According to the World Economic Forum, the global space economy is forecast to grow from about $630 billion in 2023 to $1.8 trillion by 2035.
about 630 billion · global space economy1.8 trillion · global space economy
World Economic Forum
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
The global space economy's growth rate is about twice the rate of global GDP growth.
about 2 times · global space economy growth rate
World Economic Forum
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
SpaceX’s mega-constellation could cause field-of-view losses of up to 28% for images taken by ESO’s Very Large Telescope.
28 % · maximum field-of-view losses for images taken by ESO’s Very Large Telescope
Hainaut, ESO astronomer
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
Reflect Orbital aims to expand to 50,000 satellites by 2035.
50000 satellites · Reflect Orbital satellites
Reflect Orbital, company
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
From inside a reflected beam, one Reflect Orbital satellite could appear four times brighter than the full moon, according to Hainaut’s calculations.
4 times · Reflect Orbital satellite brightness
Hainaut, ESO astronomer
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
Hainaut argues the worst impacts can only be avoided by limiting the total number of satellites to around 100,000.
about 100000 satellites · total number of satellites
Hainaut, ESO astronomer
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
Hainaut stresses that satellites must be fainter than visual magnitude 7 to remain invisible to the naked eye.
more than 7 visual magnitude · satellite visual magnitude
Hainaut, ESO astronomer
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
According to Astronomy magazine, Starlinks typically fade to magnitude 5.5 once they reach their operational orbit.
5.5 magnitude · Starlink visual magnitude
Astronomy magazine
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
Betty Kioko at the ESO’s Institutional Affairs Office said the FCC received over 1,800 comments regarding Reflect Orbital and nearly 1,500 comments on the application by SpaceX.
more than 1800 comments · comments regarding Reflect Orbitalabout 1500 comments · comments on SpaceX's application
Betty Kioko, at the ESO’s Institutional Affairs Office
View source ↗

A new study by the European Southern Observatory warns that plans to launch more than 1.7 million satellites into orbit could have “devastating consequences for astronomy,” making the night sky brighter and reducing scientists’ ability to observe the galaxy and the universe beyond. SpaceX is set to build a new economy in low Earth orbit, expanding its current Starlink telecommunications constellation and adding orbital AI data centers and even wirelessly transmitted solar power from space. The study — only the latest to warn about the scientific and environmental dangers of crowding Earth’s orbit — concludes that Earth orbit should be limited to no more than 100,000 faint satellites, all below naked-eye visibility, to protect modern ground-based astronomy. According to Orbital Radar, there are currently 17,501 satellites orbiting Earth — 10,000 of them active SpaceX Starlink satellites.

The peer-reviewed research, led by ESO astronomer Olivier Hainaut and accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics, is the first to calculate how large and bright satellite constellations could affect astronomical observations by increasing background sky brightness.

Since 2019, the number of active satellites orbiting Earth has risen rapidly, led largely by SpaceX’s Starlink network. Proposed constellations could push that figure far higher.

SpaceX has plans to launch 20,000 Starlink satellites. It currently has 10.3 million subscribers across 164 countries. It has also filed plans to send one million additional satellites into orbit for space-based data centers.

Other projects, including Reflect Orbital, E-Space’s Cinnamon constellation and China’s CTC-1 and CTC-2 systems, could add hundreds of thousands more satellites.

The global space economy is forecast to grow from about $630 billion in 2023 to $1.8 trillion by 2035, according to the World Economic Forum. That’s about twice the rate of global GDP growth.

“Until now we have managed, but it’s getting worse,” said Hainaut, an astronomer at ESO for over 30 years. Although some companies have taken steps to reduce satellite brightness, he warned that current proposals go “beyond the limit” of what astronomy can withstand.

Satellites illuminated by the sun can leave bright streaks across telescope images, blocking faint galaxies, Earth-like exoplanets and potentially dangerous asteroids. Hainaut found that SpaceX’s mega-constellation could create dozens of satellite trails in images taken by ESO’s Very Large Telescope in Chile two hours into the night. That could cause field-of-view losses of up to 28%. Since they reflect light from the sun when it’s just below the horizon, it’s always just after sunset and just before sunrise that satellites cause the most problems. Wide-field cameras, such as the one at the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, could be even more vulnerable. A bright satellite trail can saturate detectors, produce ghost trails and potentially make images unusable.

The study raises particular concern about Reflect Orbital, a U.S. start-up planning large mirror-like satellites designed to provide sunlight at night. The company aims to launch a prototype soon and expand to 50,000 satellites by 2035. Hainaut’s calculations show these satellites could become the brightest objects ever placed in orbit. From inside a reflected beam, one satellite could appear four times brighter than the full moon. Even when not aimed directly at an observer, each satellite could appear as bright as Venus. From a light-polluted city, its satellites would be the only ‘stars’ visible in the night sky.

Hainaut argues the worst impacts can only be avoided by limiting the total number of satellites, existing and future, to around 100,000. He also stresses that satellites must be fainter than visual magnitude 7, so they remain invisible to the naked eye even under dark skies. Although they can be that bright soon after launch, Starlinks are typically fade to magnitude 5.5 once they reach their operational orbit, according to Astronomy magazine.

SpaceX and Reflect Orbital have each filed with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for permission to launch. “The FCC received over 1,800 comments regarding Reflect Orbital and nearly 1,500 comments on the application by SpaceX,” said Betty Kioko at the ESO’s Institutional Affairs Office. “The ball is now in the FCC’s court, and we wait to see the determinations they make on both filings. For optical astronomy, this is an existential threat, and we hope that the regulators will share that view.”

This article was originally published by Forbes ↗. citations.press indexes the source-backed facts above and links to the original. Something wrong? Corrections policy · Report an error