Index  ›  crime  ›  NY Post
crime · NY Post ↗

2 pro-democracy activists convicted in Hong Kong, face up to 10 years in jail: ‘Most unjust’

NY Post Published Aug 23, 2026 Reviewed Aug 24, 2026 ✓ Reviewed by citations.press editors
2 pro-democracy activists convicted in Hong Kong, face up to 10 years in jail: ‘Most unjust’
Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung face up to 10 years in prison for inciting subversion.
10 years · prison term
Three Chinese Communist Party-approved national security judges claimed that Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung’s repeated use of the words “end one-party dictatorship” breached China’s National Security Law.
3 · judges Three Chinese Communist Party-approved national security judges, judges
Death toll estimates from the Tiananmen Square massacre range from 200 to 10,000.
at least 200 · death tollat most 10000 · death toll
Protests were outlawed in Hong Kong in 2020 when the National Security Law came into effect.
2020 year · year National Security Law, law
Hong Kong was handed over to China in 1997.
1997 year · year British, handed over
Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung were arrested after organizing a protest in 2021.
2021 year · year Lee and Chow, arrested
The judges issued a 16-page ruling summary.
16 pages · pages judges, issued

See more of our coverage in your search results.

Two longtime pro-democracy campaigners in Hong Kong have been convicted, and face up to 10 years in prison, for repeating a simple phrase during a vigil commemorating China’s brutal Tiananmen Square crackdown.

Lee Cheuk-yan, ‌69, and Chow Hang-tung, 41 — heads of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China — were found guilty of inciting subversion for calling for the “end one-party dictatorship” in China in 2021.

Despite the gravity of the conviction, Chow, a barista, could be seen flashing a smile of defiance as he left the West Kowloon Magistrates’ courthouse in the former British colony on Friday.

Lee’s wife, Elizabeth Tang, slammed the verdict as “most unjust,” as she stood outside court. 

“Of course there’s no surprises but still I’m disappointed and I’m angry because I don’t think he has committed any unlawful (acts),” Tang told Reuters.   

Three Chinese Communist Party-approved national security judges claimed it was Lee and Chow’s repeated use of the words, “end one-party dictatorship” rather than the protest itself that breached China’s National Security Law (NSL). 

The defendants “intended to cause others to lose confidence in the CCP by stirring up hostility and causing division, so as to achieve the objective of undermining the fundamental basic system,” the judges stated in a 16-page ruling summary.  

Lee and Chow’s group was also scrutinized for the Hong Kong demonstration marking the 1989 CCP crackdown on student protesters in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square. Death toll estimates from the massacre range from 200 to 10,000, but it is forbidden to discuss in mainland China. 

Pro democracy campaigners in Hong Kong, which the British handed over to China in 1997, have long used the anniversary of the massacre to press for freedom of speech and political autonomy.

Protests were previously tolerated in the semi-autonomous city, but were outlawed in 2020 when the NSL came into effect

Chow, a long-time protester, had attended Tiananmen Square protests since she was an elementary school student. 

Lee and Chow were arrested after organizing a protest in 2021, with the two pleading not guilty, citing Hong Kong’s freedoms of speech laws.

While Hong Kong tends to enjoy more freedoms than mainland China, the judges rejected the defense’s argument.  

This article was originally published by NY Post ↗. citations.press indexes the source-backed facts above and links to the original. Something wrong? Corrections policy · Report an error