Citation Press · Reykjavík, Iceland · Source-backed citation indexAbout us
Vol. I · Citation Index · Est. 2026

Source-backed facts, each tied to a named person and a number.

citations.press publishes structured, citation-ready facts extracted from named publications. Every claim is reviewed for source clarity before it goes live.

Index  ›  tech  ›  Ars Technica
tech · Ars Technica

Why did this journal retract two 1940s papers by Max Planck?

Ars Technica Published Jun 28, 2026 Reviewed Jun 29, 2026 ✓ Reviewed by citations.press editors
Citation-ready fact
A pair of science historians discovered that a scientific journal had inexplicably retracted two of Planck's papers from the 1940s.
2 · papers
a pair of science historians
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
The journal Naturwissenschaften removed two Planck papers entirely and left a brief note stating the articles had been "withdrawn due to article violation."
2 · Planck papers
Naturwissenschaften, journal
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
Physics historian Yves Gingras and fellow historian Mahdi Khelfaoui investigated why two of Planck's papers had been retracted.
2 · papers
Yves Gingras, Mahdi Khelfaoui, Physics historian, fellow historian
View source ↗

German physicist Max Planck was one of the pioneers of quantum mechanics in the early 20th century, earning the 1918 Nobel Prize in Physics for his discovery of quanta. There has never been a whisper of scandal about the man's integrity or his scientific work. So a pair of science historians were puzzled when they discovered that a scientific journal had inexplicably retracted two of Planck's papers from the 1940s.

The journal in question is Naturwissenschaften, now known as The Science of Nature. The journal typically adds a large RETRACTED notice across digital papers that have been retracted, leaving them available for download. But it has removed the two Planck papers entirely, leaving just a blank page (and empty PDFs) with a brief note saying the articles had been "withdrawn due to article violation.”

Physics historian Yves Gingras of the University of Quebec in Montreal was browsing the blog Retraction Watch's list of Nobel Prize winners who have had scientific papers retracted, just out of curiosity. Gingras was shocked to see Planck's name on the list and enlisted fellow historian Mahdi Khelfaoui, of the University of Quebec at Trois-Rivieres, to investigate why the two papers had been retracted. They outlined their findings in a preprint posted to the physics arXiv.

This article was originally published by Ars Technica ↗. citations.press indexes the source-backed facts above and links to the original. Something wrong? Corrections policy · Report an error