Citation Press · Reykjavík, Iceland · Source-backed citation indexAbout us
Vol. I · Citation Index · Est. 2026

Source-backed facts, each tied to a named person and a number.

citations.press publishes structured, citation-ready facts extracted from named publications. Every claim is reviewed for source clarity before it goes live.

Index  ›  politics  ›  Washington Examiner
politics · Washington Examiner

Trump applauds expanded power to fire federal employees

Washington Examiner Published Jun 29, 2026 Reviewed Jun 30, 2026 ✓ Reviewed by citations.press editors
Citation-ready fact
President Donald Trump stated that the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. Slaughter was sought by United States Presidents dating back to the 1930s.
at least 1930 year · United States Presidents seeking the decision
Donald Trump, President
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
President Donald Trump stated that 90 years of precedent have been completely and unequivocally overruled by the Supreme Court's decision in the Slaughter Case.
90 year · precedent overruled
Donald Trump, President
View source ↗

President Donald Trump embraced the Supreme Court‘s decision in Trump v. Slaughter that expands his executive power to fire members of some independent federal bodies.

“BIG WIN just moments ago at the Supreme Court, in the Slaughter Case, confirming Presidential Power in our Country to remove Executive Branch Officers and Agency Appointees, or Representatives, under Article II,” Trump wrote on Truth Social in reference to the Constitution. “This Decision was long sought by United States Presidents, dating all the way back to the 1930s.

The Supreme Court’s decision permits Trump to fire Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and, by extension, other independent agency employees.

Trump added Monday that it was “such an Honor” to be the president who won “this Historic and Unprecedented Ruling, one of the most important ever given with respect to Presidential Powers.”

“To show the importance of the Slaughter Case, 90 years of precedent has been COMPLETELY AND UNEQUIVOCALLY OVERRULED, greatly increasing Presidential Power at a time when it is most needed!” he wrote.

Trump, however, was less happy with its accompanying case, Trump v. Cook, with both majority opinions written by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts.

“The Cook Lawsuit, having to do with her suitability in sitting on the Board of the Federal Reserve, was sent back by the Supreme Court on a strictly procedural basis, we will take appropriate action immediately to make sure that someone who has committed wrongdoing will not be making vital decisions concerning the Welfare of the United States of America!” he wrote.

In that decision, the Supreme Court ruled that Trump cannot remove Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook for now because, in Roberts’s opinion, doing so “would in effect transform the Federal Reserve’s for-cause protection into at-will employment” and be “out of step with the statute Congress enacted and our nation’s tradition of central banking protected from political interference.”

That decision, in essence, creates a Federal Reserve exception to its ruling in Trump v. Slaughter because it is a “uniquely structured, quasi-private entity that follows in the distinct historical tradition of the First and Second Banks.”

Trump fired Slaughter, a Democrat, in March 2025 without cause. Trump has been trying to remove Cook since August over allegations of mortgage fraud, which she is challenging in court, with the president only permitted under the Federal Reserve Act to push out a Fed governor “for cause.”

This article was originally published by Washington Examiner ↗. citations.press indexes the source-backed facts above and links to the original. Something wrong? Corrections policy · Report an error