Index  ›  politics  ›  New Dispatch
politics · New Dispatch ↗

Andy Burnham accused of 'forcing' 1,250 illegal migrants on Piddington community despite 'zero' consultation

New Dispatch Published Aug 16, 2026 Reviewed Aug 17, 2026 ✓ Reviewed by citations.press editors
Andy Burnham accused of 'forcing' 1,250 illegal migrants on Piddington community despite 'zero' consultation
The Piddington community has a population of 350 people.
350 people · Piddington community
The village of Piddington has been earmarked to house 1,250 migrants.
1250 migrants · Piddington village
The 1,250 migrants to be housed in Piddington represent a 350% increase over the village's population.
350 % · Piddington village Tim McNally, chair of Piddington Parish Council
The Piddington Parish Council will hold a referendum on self-determination on September 15.
Tim McNally, chair of Piddington Parish Council
The government plans to move the pods to Piddington next week.
Tim McNally, chair of Piddington Parish Council
Electricity, water, and sewage will be ready to be plumbed into the pods from September 1.
Tim McNally, chair of Piddington Parish Council
The Home Office maintains that discussions about the Piddington migrant site remain in early stages.
Home Office spokesman, spokesman
The Home Office argues that moving migrants to military sites is fairer because it takes the burden off poorer communities where many asylum seekers are currently housed in hotels.
Home Office spokesman, spokesman

The chair of Piddington Parish Council has said accused the Government of failing to consult local people and is "forcing" them to accept a camp for migrants in their community.

Speaking to GB News, Tim McNally stressed that preparation has already begun for the camp with "no consultation", and before a security review has taken place.

The tiny village near Bicester in Oxfordshire has been earmarked to house 1,250 migrants in a former MoD base, which currently has no water, electricity or living quarters.

The Piddington community has a small population of just 350 people, and has no pub, shops or local amenities for the asylum seekers to use.

Sharing the latest update on the protest by the villagers, Mr McNally told GB News: "I've been approached by every single media outlet on this earth. They've been able to call me, they've been able to e-mail me, but I've had zero from No10 in terms of how we're getting on.

"Piddington is basically the tip of the spear for this entire subject across this nation. I've had to use the branding of Piddington to basically help people understand, yes, we formalise this as an environment, but we've got to do this across the whole of the nation because it's not just about Piddington, it's about how the Government is going to treat its people without consideration."

The villagers are also holding a referendum on self-determination in September, in further protest against the camp.

The council chair explained: "The referendum will happen on the September 15, which coincidentally is on the same day as the anniversary for the Battle of Britain, and at the time I didn't realise, but my goodness, how things align when things are good."

Mr McNally criticised the Government for going ahead with the plans despite "no consultation" with residents, and "forcing" the camp on them.

He said: "They're forcing this through so that no one can be consulted, even the police haven't been consulted on this matter. They're moving the pods in next week and they haven't even published the proposal, that doesn't make sense.

"We've got resources coming in, electric, water, sewage have been ready to be plumbed in from the First of September. I'm finding all of this out - not from the Government - they're just not looking after us, but no one's coming to us and saying 'you need to prepare for this'."

Having visited another migrant camp in Wethersfield, Mr McNally questioned whether the villagers need to "build compounds" around their homes to keep them safe.

He stressed: "We haven't done a security review for the village. Have we got to put a compound around our home?

"Having been to Wethersfield and heard those people who said these men are basically walking through their properties at four in the morning, what on earth are we doing to our communities?"

Mr McNally continued: "We're happy to take our fair share, absolutely, send two migrants to us and that represents a percentage of our community. 1,250 migrants to us is a 350 per cent increase of our community.

"It's about proportionality. We're not shy of taking our responsibility and helping people out and and helping them forward. What we're shy about is the fact that how are they going to assimilate into our community?

"How are 1,250 men going to assimilate into our community? I think we're going to have to assimilate into theirs, that's what's happening here now as a consequence."

Mr McNally concluded: "I'm just going to say to you, the Government better listen. MPs had better listen. The 15th of September is our referendum day, but watch how many others come with us."

In a statement, a Home Office spokesman told GB News: "The Home Office maintains that discussions about the site remain in early stages and will include engagement with local stakeholders and communities.

"The Government argues that the plan to move migrants to military sites is fairer because it takes the burden off poorer communities where many asylum seekers are currently housed in hotels."

This article was originally published by New Dispatch ↗. citations.press indexes the source-backed facts above and links to the original. Something wrong? Corrections policy · Report an error