Index  ›  tech  ›  Fortune
tech · Fortune ↗

Australia's under-16 social media ban is failing, so the government is (literally) doubling down | Fortune

Fortune Published Jun 29, 2026 Reviewed Jul 2, 2026 ✓ Reviewed by citations.press editors
Australia's under-16 social media ban is failing, so the government is (literally) doubling down | Fortune
The initial social media ban for under-16s came into force on December 10.
10 · ban effective date Communications Minister Anika Wells, Communications Minister
The Australian government announced it would introduce draft legislation to double the maximum fine for social media platforms that fail to prevent children under 16 from holding accounts to 99 million Australian dollars ($68 million).
99000000 AUD · maximum fine68000000 USD · equivalent fine The government
In March, eSafety reported that seven in 10 children who held accounts on restricted platforms on December 10 remained on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok.
70 % · proportion of children still on platforms eSafety
Parliament passed the initial social media ban legislation with overwhelming support in 2024.
2024 · year of legislation passage Parliament
eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said in April she was considering court action against platforms including YouTube, alleging they were not taking reasonable steps to exclude children.
Julie Inman Grant, eSafety Commissioner
The article states that the laws came into force on December 10.
10 December · laws came into force The article
The Australian government announced it would double the maximum fine for social media platforms to 99 million Australian dollars ($68 million).
99000000 AUD · maximum fine68000000 USD · maximum fine The government
Targeted platforms were given more than 12 months to plan to implement the ban.
more than 12 months · time given to platforms for planning The article
The government initially reported that more than 5 million children had accounts removed, deactivated, or restricted after the ban became law.
more than 5000000 children · accounts removed/deactivated/restricted The government
eSafety reported in March that 70% of children who held accounts on restricted platforms on December 10 remained on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok.
70 % · children remaining on platforms eSafety
Communications Minister Anika Wells stated she had received monthly updates from eSafety since March.
3 month · start of monthly updates from eSafety1 month · frequency of updates from eSafety Anika Wells, Communications Minister
Communications Minister Anika Wells said she had received monthly updates from eSafety since March and 'we are not seeing improvements.'
1 monthly updates · frequency of updates from eSafety Anika Wells, Communications Minister

Australia plans to double potential fines for social media platforms, including Facebook and Instagram, who fail to prevent Australian children from holding accounts as critics argue the world-first ban on under-16s was failing.

Communications Minister Anika Wells on Monday blamed the platforms’ resistance to the age restrictions for the need to toughen the laws that came into force on Dec. 10.

“We can all agree we would like the scheme to work better than it is currently, but that is on Big Tech taking the Mickey,” Wells told the Australian Broadcasting Corp., using an Australian slang term for deceiving, teasing or mocking.

The government announced Sunday it would introduce draft legislation into Parliament this week that would double the maximum fine to 99 million Australian dollars ($68 million) for platforms that fail to take reasons steps to prevent Australian children from holding accounts.

The amendments would also increase the powers of eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s online safety watchdog, to demand information and documents to ensure platforms were complying with Australian law, a government statement said.

The new powers would also include information from third parties, such as age assurance technology providers, to test claims made by the platforms about how those under 16 continued to circumvent the ban, the statement said.

Senior opposition lawmaker Jane Hume said her party would consider voting for the reforms, saying the “social media ban wasn’t working” because of deficient laws.

“The legislation was clearly undercooked in the first place. The eSafety Commissioner wasn’t given the powers to be able to pursue these Big Tech companies,” Hume said.

Parliament passed the initial legislation with overwhelming support in 2024. The targeted platforms were given more than 12 months to plan to implement the ban.

Many countries who have implemented or are planning similar restrictions have been closely watching progress of Australia’s ban.

The government initially reported more than 5 million children had accounts removed, deactivated or restricted after the ban became law.

But eSafety reported in March that seven in 10 children who held accounts on restricted platforms on Dec. 10 remained on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok.

Inman Grant said in April she was considering court action against those platforms and YouTube, alleging they were not taking reasonable steps to exclude children.

She had been satisfied with progress made by the remaining restricted platforms: X, Kick, Reddit, Threads and Twitch.

Wells said she had received monthly updates from eSafety since March and “we are not seeing improvements.”

“These (draft) changes ensure that the eSafety Commissioner has the tools and powers she needs to hold platforms to account and we’re making sure that she can do just that,” Wells said.

This article was originally published by Fortune ↗. citations.press indexes the source-backed facts above and links to the original. Something wrong? Corrections policy · Report an error