Index  ›  politics  ›  US Weekly
politics · US Weekly ↗

British Prime Minister Says Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s U.K. Move Is a ‘Private Matter’ 

US Weekly Published Aug 20, 2026 Reviewed Aug 21, 2026 ✓ Reviewed by citations.press editors
British Prime Minister Says Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s U.K. Move Is a ‘Private Matter’ 
Prime Minister Andy Burnham said the security arrangements for Prince Harry, 41, Meghan Markle, 45, and their two children were private.
41 years · Prince Harry45 years · Meghan Markle2 children · Harry and Meghan's children Andy Burnham, Prime Minister
King Charles III was made aware of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's decision to relocate back to the UK on Sunday, August 16.
King Charles III, King
Archie and Lilibet are already enrolled at a British school for the fall.
BBC, news source
Harry filed a lawsuit in 2025 for enhanced security protections, which was ultimately shot down in court.
Harry, Prince Harry
Harry told the BBC in May 2025 that he could not see a world in which he would bring his wife and children back to the U.K. at that point.
Harry, Prince Harry
Harry and Meghan were eventually able to bring Archie and Lilibet to visit King Charles III and Queen Camilla at their Highgrove House estate last month.
source, anonymous source
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex left England for California in 2020 after stepping down from their duties as senior working royals.
multiple outlets, news outlets

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s forthcoming move back to the United Kingdom is a “private matter,” according to Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

Burnham, 56, told the BBC on Thursday, August 20, that the security arrangements for Harry, 41, Meghan, 45, and their two children were “private.” (Harry and Meghan share son Prince Archie, 7, and daughter Princess Lilibet, 5.)

“It’s a matter for Harry and for Meghan,” Burnham stated. “We wish them well in the move that they are making.”

Multiple outlets — including the BBC, The Telegraph and The New York Times — reported on Wednesday, August 19, that Harry and Meghan are relocating back across the pond. (The Duke and Duchess of Sussex left England for California in 2020 after stepping down from their duties as senior working royals.)

Neither Harry nor Meghan have publicly addressed their move. Us reached out for comment.

Harry’s father, King Charles III, was made aware of the decision on Sunday, August 16. There are no plans at the moment for the Sussexes to resume their working roles.

According to the BBC, Archie and Lili are already enrolled at a British school for the fall despite Meghan’s previous hesitations.

“I have a problem with that,” Meghan told The Cut in 2022, claiming that she would be unable to personally pick her kids up from school due to rampant public attention. “That doesn’t make me obsessed with privacy, that makes me a strong and good parent protecting my child.”

As for Harry, he was equally wary about the effects of overwhelming media interest in his family. (Harry  filed a lawsuit in 2025 for enhanced security protections, which was ultimately shot down in court.)

“I can’t see a world in which I would bring my wife and children back to the U.K. at this point,” Harry told the BBC in May 2025 after losing his court appeal. “I love my country, I always have done, despite what some people in that country have done.”

While Harry found it “quite sad” that he might not be able to bring Archie and Lili to England safely, he still held out hopes for a reunion with his father and brother Prince William.

“I would love reconciliation with my family. There’s no point in continuing to fight anymore,” he stated at the time before acknowledging Charles’ cancer battle. “Life is precious. I don’t know how much longer my father has.”

Harry and Meghan were eventually able to bring Archie and Lili to visit Charles and wife Queen Camilla at their Highgrove House estate last month.

“[Charles and Camilla] wanted personal time with their grandchildren,” a source exclusively told Us in July. “They wanted it to be lighthearted and positive. The point of the meeting was to spend time with them, and that was the only thing on the agenda.”

This article was originally published by US Weekly ↗. citations.press indexes the source-backed facts above and links to the original. Something wrong? Corrections policy · Report an error