Index  ›  finance  ›  City PM
finance · City PM ↗

HMRC secures £190m VAT appeal win against Bolt

City PM Published Jun 17, 2026 Reviewed Jul 3, 2026 ✓ Reviewed by citations.press editors
Citation-ready fact
HMRC argued in February 2023 that Bolt did not qualify for the tour operators’ margin scheme (TOMS).
2023 · HMRC argument date
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
The Court of Appeal backed HMRC’s position that Bolt should not be allowed to use TOMS, a scheme designed for tour operators and travel agents.
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
HMRC won an appeal against Bolt over VAT calculation, overturning prior rulings in Bolt's favor, with an estimated £190m in unpaid VAT at stake.
about 190000000 GBP · unpaid VAT
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
Uber has an ongoing legal battle over a £1bn VAT bill related to TOMS, awaiting a tax tribunal hearing.
about 1000000000 GBP · VAT bill
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
The decision overturns two previous tribunal decisions (upper and lower) that had ruled in Bolt’s favor.
2 · tribunal decisions overturned
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
Black cab drivers urged the government to close the tax loophole used by Uber and Bolt, writing to the Chancellor in November last year.
11 · month of letter
View source ↗

HMRC has won an appeal against ride hailing platform Bolt over how it calculates and pays its VAT, overturning previous decisions that had ruled in favour of Bolt.

This follows an appeal hearing last month brought by the tax authority, which had questioned whether Bolt could use the tour operators’ margin scheme (TOMS). Under this scheme, businesses only pay VAT on the profit margin they make between buying a service and selling it to the customer.

By qualifying for this scheme, the Estonian tech giant is only required to account for VAT on the commission it takes from the fare, rather than the entire gross fare paid by the passenger. Bolt’s appeal involves an estimated £190m in unpaid VAT.

HMRC argued in February 2023 that Bolt did not qualify for this scheme, and the Court of Appeal backed the tax authority said Bolt should not be allowed to use a tax scheme originally designed for tour operators and travel agents.

The decision overturns two previous upper and lower tribunal decisions which had concluded that Bolt’s services fell within the scheme, and the court in its judgment said Bolt’s services “are neither identical nor relevantly comparable” to those that fall under the TOMs scheme.

This means Bolt is required to charge VAT on the entire fare they charge rather than just on its commission-based margin.

Ride hailing giant Uber has a similar ongoing legal battle over a £1bn VAT bill over TOMS, awaiting to be heard by the tax tribunal, which this decision could impact.

The court said in its judgment other cases, including Uber’s,”are awaiting its [Bolt’s case’s] outcome.”

Black cab drivers already urged that the government must close this tax loophole used by Uber and Bolt, writing to the Chancellor last November asking her to make the tech ride-hailing apps pay the same level of VAT as cabbies.

This article was originally published by City PM ↗. citations.press indexes the source-backed facts above and links to the original. Something wrong? Corrections policy · Report an error