Index  ›  politics  ›  Express
politics · Express ↗

LBC

Express Published Aug 22, 2026 Reviewed Aug 23, 2026 ✓ Reviewed by citations.press editors
LBC
Sussexes' security could cost taxpayers £5 million a year.
5000000 £ · Sussexes' security James O'Brien, presenter
The Sussexes are moving back to the UK six years after stepping down from their roles as senior working royals.
6 years · Sussexes LBC, report

LBC presenter James O'Brien came under fire as he reacted to reports of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's return. It was recently revealed that the Sussexes are moving back to the UK six years after stepping down from their roles as senior working royals and relocating to Montecito. The couple are reportedly making their home in a non-royal residence outside of London, while their two children, Prince Archie, seven, and Princess Lilibet, five, have been enrolled in schools.

Reacting to what he described as the media's "obsessive" coverage of the Sussexes' latest announcement, James said on his LBC radio show: "The Daily Mail reports 'couple moves house.' Page one, the absolute splash. This is the only story on the front page of their newspaper. 'Harry swanning back in must be enraging from William.' How do you know? Spoiler alert, you don't. 'Their friends tell me Meghan is fully behind the shock move.' Right.

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

'Breaking news! Couple moves house!'

James O'Brien reacts to the media's 'obsessive' coverage of Prince Harry and Meghan. pic.twitter.com/4PiKqyPY8l

"'How this will shape the future of the monarchy.' Okay. It's good that we're not getting carried away here, lads. Let's keep it on the down low.

"And then the front page. 'Return of the prodigal prince. Sussexes' security could cost taxpayers £5 million a year – Will it? No idea, but it could.

"It could cost £50 million, it could cost a gazillion pounds here, it could cost 12p, but stick all that on the front – Doesn't matter, you've got your front page."

He called out what he described as the newspaper's "obsession" with Harry, 41, and Meghan, 45, blasting the "breaking news" of the couple moving house.

The presenter sparked backlash with his comments, with many claiming that it is him who is obsessed with the couple.

One wrote: "Late middle aged, individual demonstrates exasperation at the amount of media coverage for a pair of grifters by btc out of anyone listening by covering the same topic on his show."

Another agreed: "By obsessively covering the obsessiveness you are by default obsessive. However James O'Brien is irony impaired like any far lefty. Still won’t put this channel on my car for danger of even hearing his rants."

A third echoed: "JoB is literally talking about it; does he not think he's part of the media? He's no different from using the Markle's for something to broadcast."

A fourth commented: "From what I've seen, nobody obsesses over them more than this man."

Another argued: "Obsessive? Harry and Meghan spit on their family with lies, interviews, national publication, and now crawling back for money cause they don’t have shit in the United States. They dished it out. They definitely deserve to get it right back."

This article was originally published by Express ↗. citations.press indexes the source-backed facts above and links to the original. Something wrong? Corrections policy · Report an error