Index  ›  legal  ›  BBC
legal · BBC ↗

Meta told to pay another $567m in New Mexico child safety lawsuit

BBC Published Aug 6, 2026 Reviewed Aug 7, 2026 ✓ Reviewed by citations.press editors
Meta told to pay another $567m in New Mexico child safety lawsuit
Meta was ordered by a New Mexico judge to pay $567 million for failing to warn the public about dangers its platforms posed to children, the largest child‑safety ruling against the company.
567 USD · Meta421 GBP · Meta Judge Bryan Biedscheid, judge
The total amount Meta must pay in the New Mexico child safety lawsuit is $942 million.
942 USD · Meta Judge Bryan Biedscheid, judge
Meta was previously ordered to pay $375 million in fines in the same child safety lawsuit.
375 USD · Meta Judge Bryan Biedscheid, judge
The child safety lawsuit against Meta was filed in 2023 by attorneys for the State of New Mexico.
2023 year · child safety lawsuit attorneys for the State of New Mexico, attorneys

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has seen his company face an increasing number of lawsuits over child safety.

A US judge in New Mexico on Thursday ordered Meta to pay another $567m (£421m) for its failure to warn the public about dangers its platforms posed to children, marking the largest ruling against the company over child safety.

Judge Bryan Biedscheid said the social media giant is a "public nuisance" akin to air pollution and that it must put the money in a fund aimed at reducing future harms.

The ruling is in addition to $375m in fines Meta was already ordered to pay in the case, for a total of $942m.

Judge Biedscheid compared Meta to a factory, with advertising and content as its product and "the psychological harm and sexual exploitation of children to be the pollution that must be abated".

Meta, which owns and operates Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp and Threads, has been contacted by the BBC for comment.

Regarding the earlier $375m verdict against in the case, Meta had said it intended to appeal the ruling. It was the first time that a state had successfully sued Meta over child safety issues.

The case stems from a 2023 lawsuit brought by attorneys for the State of New Mexico, arguing Meta should be held liable for the way in which its platforms endangered children and exposed them to sexually explicit material and contact with sexual predators.

In the first phase of the trial, Meta was found to have repeatedly violated New Mexico's Unfair Practices Act as its recommendation algorithms essentially "steered" young users toward harmful content and contacts.

Recommendation algorithms are the tools that Meta uses to automatically curate the content a user sees on its platforms.

In ruling on this second phase of the trial, Judge Biedscheid found that Meta's harms reached the level of "public nuisance", or an issue of health and safety that has become so widespread it is negatively impacting a general public.

In addition to being the largest fine Meta has received over child safety issues, the ruling also appears to be the first time that a social media company has been deemed a public nuisance.

"Just as noxious pollution produced by the factory can harm the common public right to reasonably clean air, the harmful effects of Meta's platforms on children do not stay contained by its platforms and, instead, migrate to the internet as a whole and, perhaps most concerning, to the real world and create a common, societal burden on and harm to the affected children and their families and schools, as well as hospitals and law enforcement," the judge wrote.

This article was originally published by BBC ↗. citations.press indexes the source-backed facts above and links to the original. Something wrong? Corrections policy · Report an error