Index  ›  ai  ›  TechRadar

What is an AI agent builder? And why should businesses consider using it?

TechRadar Published Jun 30, 2026 Reviewed Jul 3, 2026 ✓ Reviewed by citations.press editors
Citation-ready fact
Gartner expects 40% of enterprise applications to include task-specific AI agents by the end of 2026, up from under 5% in 2025.
40 % · enterprise applicationsat least 5 % · enterprise applications
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
McKinsey has estimated that generative AI could add up to $4.4 trillion a year to the global economy.
at least 4400000000000 USD · generative AI
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
A 2025 IBM study of 2,000 CEOs found that only 25% of AI initiatives had delivered the ROI leaders expected.
25 % · AI initiatives
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
A 2025 IBM study of 2,000 CEOs found that only 16% of AI initiatives had scaled across the whole business.
16 % · AI initiatives
View source ↗
Citation-ready fact
Gartner predicts that more than 40% of agentic AI projects will be cancelled by the end of 2027 because of rising costs, unclear business value, or weak risk controls.
more than 40 % · agentic AI projects
View source ↗

You've probably noticed the same handful of tasks eating your week: chasing invoices, answering customer questions, copying data between tools that don't talk to each other. Then "AI agents" started showing up everywhere, from tech newsletters to LinkedIn; you're left wondering whether any of it applies to a business your size. The honest answer is that it usually does, no coding skills required.

Maybe you've already tried a chatbot or a basic automation tool to cut down on repetitive admin. Both helped for a while, then hit a ceiling: chatbots answer a question and stop, while basic automation only runs the exact steps you set up originally. AI agent builders are built to close that gap, letting you create something that can finish a job from start to finish instead of stopping halfway.

Whether you are looking for a copywriter, a customer support agent, or a social media manager, Sintra has an AI-powered digital assistant that can help.

Right now, you can save an impressive 72% off all plans with code TECH72.

At its simplest, an AI agent builder is a platform that lets you design, deploy, and manage AI agents without coding them from scratch. The agents themselves run on large language models (LLMs) that can reason about a request, decide which tools to use, and carry out several steps toward a goal.

That's the part that separates an agent from a basic chatbot. A chatbot answers what you type into it. An agent can look up an order, update a record, and send a follow-up email from a single instruction, then report back once the job is done.

Every agent builder, however polished, is made of the same basic pieces. You give it instructions in plain language or a visual flow. The platform connects those instructions to your tools and data through APIs, then handles the reasoning and orchestration behind the scenes.

Most platforms also add memory, so an agent can recall earlier steps in a task. They pair that with guardrails that limit what the agent is allowed to do without a person signing off first.

Builders generally fall into three categories. No-code tools use guided steps and templates built for people with no programming background. Low-code tools expose the underlying logic, so technical teams can adjust it without starting from zero.

Pro-code frameworks such as LangChain sit at the far end, handing developers full control over memory, tool access, and orchestration. IBM's research on enterprise builders suggests the right choice depends less on team size than on how much oversight the work needs once it's live. A small business automating a single email workflow rarely needs the same setup as a bank automating fraud checks.

The case for an agent builder comes down to time and reach. Agents complete actual work instead of just suggesting it. They do this continuously, without adding headcount.

The numbers back this up well. Gartner expects 40% of enterprise applications to include task-specific AI agents by the end of 2026, up from under 5% in 2025. McKinsey has estimated that generative AI, the technology underpinning these agents, could add up to $4.4 trillion a year to the global economy.

None of this happens automatically, though. A 2025 IBM study of 2,000 CEOs found that only 25% of AI initiatives had delivered the ROI leaders expected. Just 16% had scaled across the whole business, which says less about the technology than about how carefully it was deployed.

AI agents tend to cluster around a handful of jobs. The same patterns show up whether you run a five-person shop or a five-thousand-person company:

Smaller businesses tend to start with one, often customer service or lead handling, before expanding once the first agent proves its worth.

The right platform depends heavily on your existing tools and your team's technical comfort. If your business already runs on Microsoft 365, Copilot Studio lets you build agents inside that ecosystem, with internal agent use bundled into Microsoft 365 Copilot licenses and a standalone option for publishing agents outside it.

If your business lives in Salesforce, Agentforce builds agents directly on top of your CRM data, with a free Foundations tier to start and consumption-based credits beyond that. For broader, non-technical automation, tools such as Zapier Agents and Lindy let small teams connect an agent to email, spreadsheets, and thousands of other apps using plain-language prompts rather than code.

Larger organisations weighing governance more heavily often look at platforms such as IBM watsonx Orchestrate, which offers no-code, low-code, and pro-code paths in one place, with centralised oversight over what every agent is allowed to touch. Engineering-led teams that want full control, meanwhile, tend to build directly with open-source frameworks like LangChain rather than a packaged product.

As a general rule, the more deeply your business already runs on one ecosystem, like Microsoft or Salesforce, the more sense it makes to build your first agent inside that same ecosystem rather than bolting on a separate tool. Before you commit to any platform, it's worth getting clear answers to a short list of questions:

Adoption is moving fast, but it isn't risk-free. Gartner predicts that more than 40% of agentic AI projects will be cancelled by the end of 2027 because of rising costs, unclear business value, or weak risk controls. Gartner has also warned of "agent washing," where vendors rebrand older chatbots or automation tools as agents without the underlying capability to match.

An agent is only as good as the data it can see, too. If your records are scattered across spreadsheets, inboxes, and three different apps that don't sync, an agent will struggle no matter how good the platform is. Clean, accessible data is the unglamorous prerequisite that most successful deployments get right before anything else.

Security deserves the same scrutiny you'd give any other system with access to your data.

It's also worth thinking about lock-in before you build anything substantial. Agents built deep inside one vendor's ecosystem, like a CRM or productivity suite, are usually harder to move later than ones built on an open framework or with clear data-export options. That's a reasonable trade-off for the convenience many platforms offer, as long as you go in with eyes open about it.

Start small. Pick one workflow with clear, measurable value. Run it in a sandbox or a limited rollout before expanding it further.

Keep a person in the loop for anything customer-facing or financially sensitive until the agent has proven itself. Revisit that oversight regularly, rather than setting it once and walking away.

Not for most platforms aimed at small businesses. No-code builders use plain-language prompts and visual flows, so a non-technical team member can typically build and launch a simple agent in an afternoon. More complex, multi-system workflows usually benefit from at least some technical input, even if it's just to set up the integrations.

No. Robotic process automation follows a fixed script and breaks when something deviates from it. An AI agent can reason about unexpected inputs and adjust its approach mid-task, though that flexibility is also why it needs guardrails that traditional RPA doesn't.

Most current deployments are built to handle the repetitive parts of a role, not the whole role itself, freeing people for judgment calls and customer relationships an agent can't make. The long-term picture is debated among economists and analysts. Businesses adopting agents should still be upfront with staff about which tasks are changing and why.

An AI assistant, the kind of chat tool you ask questions directly, mainly helps a person do their own work faster. An AI agent is built to carry out a task on its own, often across multiple steps and systems, with a person checking in rather than doing every step themselves.

Ritoban Mukherjee is a tech and innovations journalist from West Bengal, India. These days, most of his work revolves around B2B software, such as AI website builders, VoIP platforms, and CRMs, among other things. He has also been published on Tom's Guide, Creative Bloq, IT Pro, Gizmodo, Quartz, and Mental Floss.

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.

This article was originally published by TechRadar ↗. citations.press indexes the source-backed facts above and links to the original. Something wrong? Corrections policy · Report an error