What's Driving Motorsports Today? Data, Judgment And Team Execution

Erum Manzoor is CEO of BOX Motorsports & Founder of VectorE Ventures, focused on motorsport, AI strategy, & high-pressure execution systems.

Spend enough time around high-pressure systems, and one pattern becomes difficult to ignore: the moment pressure arrives, every weakness becomes visible.

For business leaders, motorsports is one of the clearest places to study execution under pressure.

People often talk about racing through speed, adrenaline, driver talent or the spectacle of a car moving at the edge of control, and all of that is part of the pull. The sound, courage and emotion bring people into the sport long before they understand the system behind it, but motorsports has grown because it turns passion into discipline, risk into design and pressure into a test of execution.

A race does not give people the luxury of long explanations. Weather changes, tires degrade, a safety car appears, a driver reports instability or an opponent pits earlier than expected, and the team has seconds to decide whether to stay with the plan or change it.

That is the business lesson inside motorsports. Leadership gets tested when time is limited, information is incomplete and consequences arrive immediately.

The roots of automobile racing go back to the 1880s, when gasoline-powered internal-combustion engines were becoming practical. One of the earliest organized competitions, the 1894 Paris-to-Rouen reliability trial, covered about 80 kilometers and was won at an average speed of 16.4 kph (10.2 mph). That number may look modest now, but at the time, it tested something much bigger: whether machines could endure distance, drivers could control them and new technology could earn trust outside controlled conditions.

That early history still gives the sport its edge because motorsports has always put uncomfortable questions in public view:

By 1950, motorsports had entered a more formal global era with the first Formula 1 World Championship race at Silverstone, where Giuseppe “Nino” Farina won for Alfa Romeo. From there, it became a serious stage for engineering, driver skill, commercial ambition, media value and technical competition. Each decade added stronger regulations, better materials, larger audiences, deeper sponsorship models, advanced logistics and greater safety expectations, while the sport worked to keep the emotion that made people care in the first place.

The driver remains central because no system can replace the person inside the car, feeling the grip, reading the corner and deciding how much risk the moment can take.

In my recent conversations with technology leaders, motorsports enthusiasts and drivers, this point kept coming up in different ways. People respect driver skill, and they are starting to see how much modern racing depends on the system around the driver. A result can change because of a pit call, a tire decision, a slow response, a data reading or a crew that stays clear when the moment gets tense. Business leaders should study that closely because races often turn on how quickly a team can turn information into action.

The pit stop makes that reality impossible to ignore. A modern Formula 1 pit stop may take less than three seconds, but the result starts long before the car reaches the box. Formula 1’s own explanation notes that the crew ideally gets into position 15 to 20 seconds before the car arrives, with tires, equipment, adjustments and roles already prepared. Viewers see the burst of movement, but the real work happened earlier through training, role clarity, timing and trust.

Many businesses fail here. They hire talented people, buy advanced tools and build dashboards, yet still struggle when pressure arrives because the operating model underneath the talent is unclear. Motorsports exposes that weakness instantly. A great strategy means little if the team cannot execute it under live conditions.

Data has raised the stakes even further. In 1975, McLaren first deployed telemetry on its IndyCar program, collecting 14 pieces of information from the car that engineers could download back in the garage. Today, a Formula 1 car carries over 300 sensors and generates around 1.1 million telemetry data points per second. The race car has become a moving data environment, constantly reporting on performance, temperature, stress, tire behavior, driver inputs and mechanical condition.

The uncomfortable truth is that data can still create confusion when leaders do not know how to use it.

A team can have simulations, telemetry, predictive tools, historic patterns and live feeds from the car, but someone still has to decide which signal matters. Motorsports teaches a lesson many executives are still learning in their own industries. Information does not create advantage until people turn it into judgment.

Safety shows the same maturity. Motorsports has lived close to danger for its entire history, and that reality has forced the industry to keep learning from incidents, evidence, engineering and regulation. After years of testing and debate, the Halo became mandatory in Formula 1 in 2018. FIA testing showed that, in car-to-car incident scenarios, the device could withstand 15 times the static load of the full mass of the car and reduce injury potential. Serious industries study risk, measure it, design around it and change the system when evidence demands change.

The commercial scale of the sport shows how far that evolution has reached. Formula 1 reported a global fanbase of 827 million in 2025, up 12% year over year, and up from 63% compared with 2018. Liberty Media reported that Formula 1 revenue rose 14% to $3.9 billion in 2025, with fan attendance reaching 6.75 million and live viewership increasing 21% compared with 2024.

Growth also brings pressure. Formula 1 has committed to reach net zero by 2030 and reported a 26% reduction in carbon emissions by the end of 2024 compared with its 2018 baseline.

The next era of motorsports will test whether the industry can protect the emotion of speed while improving travel, operations, energy use and accountability. Performance begins before the lights go out, in systems teams build and trust they earn.

Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?